Please call to schedule your free initial consultation: 403.262.1110|melanie@yycdefence.ca

Appeal Lawyers Calgary

Sitar & Milczarek

Criminal Appeals & Complex Trials

The Defence Toolkit

clawbies-winner-2020
[dsm_breadcrumbs separator_bg_color=”RGBA(255,255,255,0)” _builder_version=”4.23.1″ _module_preset=”default” items_text_color=”#CB9231″ separators_text_color=”#CCCCC3″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/dsm_breadcrumbs]

The Defence Toolkit serves up summaries and commentary on the editor’s choice of the three best Canadian criminal defence cases every week. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn to get notified of new posts.

The Defence Toolkit – January 10, 2026: After the Fact Demeanour

This week's top three summaries: R v Townsend, 2025 BCCA 459: #after the fact, R v ZML, 2025 ONCA 872: accused #fabrication, R v Meeko, 2025 NUCA 12: #bad character R v Townsend, 2025 BCCA 459 [December 22, 2025] After the Fact Conduct: Post Offence Demeanour [Reasons by Justice MacNaughton with Horsman and Fleming JJ.A. concurring] AUTHOR'S NOTE: Frustration is an inherently ambiguous human emotion. It may arise from culpable conduct, but it may just as readily result from any number of...

The Defence Toolkit – December 20, 2025: Christmas Cheer from the Courts

This week's top three summaries: R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43: s.9 #arrest, R v Stuart, 2025 ABCA 404: #cross & s.276, R v Linklater, 2025 MBCA 104: #eye-witness ID R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 [December 12, 2025] Charter s.9 - The Power to Arrest is Limited by s. 495(2) [Reasons by Côté J. with Wagner C.J., and Karakatsanis, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and M,  concurring] AUTHOR'S NOTE: The police power of arrest is constrained not only by the requirement of reasonable grounds,...

The Defence Toolkit – December 6, 2025: Courtroom Confrontation

This week's top three summaries: R v McDonald, 2025 ONCA 807: Browne v Dunn, R v Brennan, 2025 ONSC 6116: s.8 #marijuana smell, R v MR, 2025 ONCA 789: #appeal bail R v McDonald, 2025 ONCA 807 [November 25, 2025] The Rule in Browne v Dunn [Reasons by Fairburn A.C.J.O., with David M. Paciocco and A. Harvison Young JJ.A. concurring] AUTHOR'S NOTE: The Rule in Browne v. Dunn is grounded in trial fairness, which means its application is highly fact-specific. The jurisprudence does not require...
The Defence Toolkit – November 22, 2025: Functioning Technology

The Defence Toolkit – November 22, 2025: Functioning Technology

This week's top three summaries: R v Bjil, 2025 SKCA 116: #technology, R v Lessard, 2025 ONCA 760: #NCRMD, R v Krelove, 2025 ONSC 6004: #domestic discharge R v Bijl, 2025 SKCA 116 [November 13, 2025] Evidence of Functioning Technology: Radar [Reasons by Kilback J.A....

The Defence Toolkit – November 15, 2025: Remand Retribution

The Defence Toolkit – November 15, 2025: Remand Retribution

This week's top three summaries: R v Whitlock, 2025 ONSC 6006: #remand s.12, R v EJ, 2025 ONSC 6016: #self-defence, R v CB, 2025 ONSC 6004: cross-count #similar fact R. v. Whitlock, 2025 ONSC 6006 [October 24, 2025] Charter s.12: Remand Retribution by Staff [Conlan...

The Defence Toolkit-  November 8, 2025: Mandatory Minimums

The Defence Toolkit- November 8, 2025: Mandatory Minimums

This week's top three summaries: Quebec (AG) v Senneville, 2025 SCC 33: min #sentence, R v Hutton, 2025 ABCA 356: 271 mens rea, R v Backfat, 2025 ABCJ 183: #delayed counsel and release Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33 [October 31, 2025] Charter...

The Defence Toolkit – November 1, 2025: The Good Samaritan

The Defence Toolkit – November 1, 2025: The Good Samaritan

This week's top three summaries: R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32: #GoodSamaritan, R v Ukuqtunnuaq, 2025 NUCA 8: #fresh evidence, R v Liu, 2025 SKCA 98: #expert evidence R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 [October 24, 2025] The Good Samaritan Exception to Drug Possession [Majority...

Browse Popular Categories

Evidence

Sentencing

Charter s.8

Appeals

Credibility

Sexual Assault

More Articles

The Defence Toolkit – October 25, 2025: Expert Experience and Bias

The Defence Toolkit – October 25, 2025: Expert Experience and Bias

This week's top three summaries: R v Matthews, 2025 ABKB 597: #expert bias, R v RL, 2025 ONCA 691: #acquittal appeal, R v Wilson, 2025 ABCA 337: #contempt R. v. Matthews, 2025 ABKB 597 [October 14, 2025] Expert Evidence: Experience and Bias [Justice Lisa A. Silver]...

The Defence Toolkit – October 18, 2025: Criminal Defence Crisis

The Defence Toolkit – October 18, 2025: Criminal Defence Crisis

This week's top three summaries: R v BN, 2025 ABKB 535: #ineffective lawyer, R v Shah, 2025 ABKB 535: s.8 #informant, R v Mohamed Mussa, 2025 ABKB 543: #circumstantial ID R. v. BN, 2025 ABKB 535 [September 18, 2025] Ineffective Assistance of Counsel [Justice C.D....

The Defence Toolkit – October 4, 2025: Police Agents

The Defence Toolkit – October 4, 2025: Police Agents

This week's top three summaries: R v Pham, 2025 BCCA 324: police #agent, R v KWP, 2025 ABCA 312: judge #propensity, R v IJM, 2025 ABCA 311: 271 #delayed report R. v. Pham, 2025 BCCA 324 [September 17, 2025] Charter s.8: Corporate Police Agency [Reasons by Dewitt-Van...

The lawyers at Sitar & Milczarek love written advocacy and ghostwriting services

Our lawyers have been litigating criminal trials and appeals for over 16 years in courtrooms throughout Canada. We can be of assistance to your practice. Whether you are looking for an appeal referral or some help with a complex written argument, our firm may be able to help. Our firm provides the following services available to other lawyers for referrals or contract work:

  1. Criminal Appeals
  2. Complex Criminal Litigation
  3. Ghostwriting Criminal Legal Briefs

Please review the rest of the website to see if our services are right for you.

Stay Up to Date With The Latest News & Updates

Follow Us

Keep up to date with latest news and content in criminal law